Saturday, July 26, 2014

The new version of the video from the Straight line: "Oleksandr Suprunyuk. Interview from the Maidan / Олександр Супрунюк. Інтерв‘ю з Майдану"

The new version of the video from the Straight line:  Oleksandr Suprunyuk / Олександр Супрунюк. Інтерв‘ю з Майдану"
Our group Straight line conducted a long interview at the end of March with Oleksandr Suprunyuk a 51-year-old construction-company owner from Netishyn town, Khmelnytsky region. He has been an organizer and participant of many initiatives for many years, in orange revolution 2004, in Avtomajdan, etc. He was from the first days on the Maidan in november last year. He has been heavily involved in Majdan tents and was a member of the 38th division of the protesters’ defense force (Sotnya).
You certainly saw many images on the Internet about Majdan. There are images of actions and some short and spontaneous interviews of people. We wanted to do a serious interview, to provide a moment of reflection to the outsiders of Majdan,
but also to the
participants themselves.
The event of Majdan is unique and fabulous. At the same time, Majdan has many things in common with other protests in Europe, Arab countries and the world. We now understand that in recent years, an urban riot can
occur in any country. The insurrectional fact is a reality.
But in each insurrection, rebellion stops at a given time, sometimes before the fall of the government, sometimes after its fall. This is a crucial question whether the Majdan still exists or not, and how. We think it is important to see Majdan as a process. To see Majdan as a process, one must understand that the riot does not stop when there is a new government. Some people see Majdan as a parenthesis or a dream. We see Majdan as a wonderful self-organizing experience. Experience that participants and observers should see the full legitimacy. Many analysts, politicians, intelligentsia, actual power seek to hide somehow this experience, the experience of the people. The experiences of people are usually disqualified as insufficiently elaborated, naïve, hierarchically inferior, knowledge that are below the required level of erudition and scientificity.
In Straight line, we want to reveal their existence by using different tools. We wanted to group together and put in the same category, on the one hand meticulous, precise, technical protest analysis and, on the other, singular, local knowledge, the noncommonsensical knowledges that people have and which have been kept in the margins. In others words, we do a meticulous rediscovery of struggles and a raw history of fights. The aim is to use that in contemporary tactics.
In all Europe, we are connected with political communities organize themselves and act daily. With this experience and skills, we formulated questions for the interview.
The Majdan has given rise to many interpretations and rewrites. It has already become a highly contested memorial issue. This interview is a testament to the Majdan inside tents. Its sheds light on the present.


No comments:

Post a Comment